the 2:1 ratio

the 2:1 ratio

scot rao

if third wavers are good at anything, it’s following trends and adopting new dogmas.  if i didn’t know any better, i would say that most young baristas are glued to instagram all day, just waiting to see what trend they should unquestioningly follow next.  call me crazy.

one of the stickier trends in the past couple of years has been the near-religious adherence, at least in the us, to the 2:1 espresso-brewing ratio.  i’d like to discuss what an espresso-brewing ratio (ebr) is, why it’s relevant, and why it’s a little silly for so many cafes to latch on to this suspiciously harmonious ratio.

what is an espresso-brewing ratio?

simply put, it’s the ratio of an espresso’s beverage weight to the weight of the dry grounds used to make the shot.  for example, if a barista pulls a 36 g shot from 18 g of grounds , the ratio would be 2:1.

why ebr is relevant

i suspect most baristas do not realize this: if you have exact targets for extraction % and tds, there is only one ebr that can produce a shot that achieves both targets. for example, let’s say you desire a 20% extraction and 10% tds. using a slightly simplified calculation, the only ebr that can produce a 20% extraction/10% tds shot is a 2:1 ratio.

for example, with a 20 g dose and 40 g shot:

10% tds = 4 g of coffee solids (10% x 40 g shot = 4 g)

4 g of coffee solids extracted from a 20 g dose = 20% extraction.

a 2:1 ebr can yield a spectrum of extraction/tds combinations; for example 8% tds/16% extraction or 9%tds/18%ext.  but no other ebr can produce any of the combinations mentioned above.

what if you want 10% tds and a 22% extraction?  that requires an ebr of 2.2:1.*  and so on. (note that your ebr also happens to approximate the ratio of your chosen extraction% to tds.)

*these calculations are slightly simplified to help illustrate the concept; please don’t get hung up on the imprecision.

sam sgambellone of coffee kaizen generously shared this chart showing the possible extraction% / tds combinations possible with various ebrs.  thanks, sam !

why it’s a mistake for most cafes to get hung up on the 2:1 ratio

i’d like to offer three assertions :

1. a cafe should choose its ebr, ground dose, and shot weight as a system, based on the style and size of drinks it serves.

ii. the “best” extraction % using a given set of brewing parameters (e.g. shot time, ratio, temperature, etc.) is usually the highest that one can achieve.  various combinations of grinder and espresso machine may call for different ebrs and extraction levels to yield the best-tasting shots.  (i.e. better machinery can yield higher extractions at lower ebrs.)

iii. most cafes using a 2:1 ratio serve underextracted espresso and should explore higher ebrs to make their espresso riper, less sour, and less sharp.

based on these assertions, the “one size fits all” approach to ebr seems a little unreasonable.

how to choose an appropriate dose and ebr

let’s look at three espresso shots :

the first shot is destined to be drowned in a 16 oz ( 450ml ) latte in the us.  for the coffee flavor to not disappear in the milk, the barista may want to cram as much coffee solids as reasonably possible in the l

drink.  the barista may choose a large, 20 g dose and a higher ebr, of let’s say 2.5:1.  at a 21% extraction and 8.4% tds, the baristas has added 4.2 g of coffee solids to the latte.

the second shot is pulled by a barista in rome, and is destined for a 5 oz ( 150 ml ) cappuccino. the italian barista will likely use 7 g of coffee and a 2:1 ratio to yield a 19 % extraction and 9.5% tds. he will have added 1.3 g of coffee solids to the drink. ( it’s surprising but true: large lattes in the us and cappuccini in italy are typically of similar strength. italian capps likely often seem stronger due to frequent use of darker roasts and lots of robusta.)

the third shot is pulled by a barista in melbourne as a “short black.” to provide high extraction and good flavor clarity using a light-roast geisha (washed, of course), the barista may choose a high ratio such as 3:1 and modest tds. for example, most australian baristas “split shots” (pull two separate shots per portafilter) and may use 20 g of grounds and a 3:1 ratio to yield two short blacks, each a 30 g shot from a 10 g dose.  such a shot may have an extraction of 22% and tds of 7.3% to optimize flavor and clarity at the expense of strength and body.

the best extraction is the highest extraction, within reason

i can’t tell you what the “best” extraction level is for your espresso shots.  but i will tell you that you’ve probably never had an overextracted espresso.  what?? yes, it's true.  sure, you’ve had shots that were channeled, bitter, or had overextracted flavors. but when’s the last time you accidentally pulled, say, a 26% extraction, without doing something extreme, like using a 10:1 ratio?  the “overextracted” shots you’ve pulled were channeled, or perhaps your burrs were dull or misaligned, but your shots were not overextracted in the mathematical sense.  if you’re pulling 21% shots using an ek and you think they’re overextracted, check your burrs and your puck prep prior to lowering your extraction target.

baristas should usually aim for the highest extraction possible when using standard ebrs (very high ebrs will always channel extensively, and in such cases maximizing extraction may not be wise.) if you taste symptoms of overextraction, work on your puck prep and ensure you’re using adequate preinfusion (very few baristas do).

most cafes attempting to use a 2:1 ratio are underextracting their espresso.

the most important reason most baristas should question the 2:1 ratio is that they may be serving underextracted espresso.  by “underextracted” i simply mean the coffee would taste better if the extractions were higher. 

simply put, if you’ve got a setup such as a mazzer grinder (low extractions) and a la marzocco linea (no proper preinfusion, no pressure decline), and you use a 2:1 ratio, you’re likely underextracting.  using an espresso machine that offers slow, low-flow preinfusion, or a well-programmed pressure-profile machine, and/or using a higher-extracting grinder, such as a mythos or a peak, can each significantly boost extraction quality and quantity.  unfortunately, equipment selection is another area where baristas and shop owners do more trend following than analytical thinking.

how to test whether your coffee would taste better at a higher extraction

this is not a foolproof test, but it’s worth trying, and takes only a few minutes.  let’s say you typically pull shots with 2:1 ebrs using 18g in/36g out in 30 seconds.  try this instead: set your grinder one small notch coarser.  purge a couple of doses from the grinder. pull a 3:1 ratio shot (18g in/ 54g out) in 30—35 seconds.  you've now likely increased extraction by more than one percentage point.  assuming the shot did not channel more than usual, taste the coffee and evaluate whether you prefer the flavor to that of your 2:1 ratio shots.  ıf you were underextracting at 2:1, you’ll likely find the 3:1 shot is juicier, less sharp, and less sour.

the test is imperfect, primarily because we’ve changed the flow rate, but almost all baristas who have done this test with me preferred the flavor of the 3:1 shot over the 2:1 shot.

the upshot

when choosing an ebr, consider factors such as your preferred extraction level, tds, shot weight, beverage size, the quality of your equipment, and the purpose of the shots (will it be served black? how much milk does it have to balance?). one factor to not consider is what everyone else is doing.  sure, if an expert such as james h. or matt p. makes a recommendation, give it serious consideration and a fair trial.  but if you make brewing and equipment choices based on what everyone else does, you’ll likely make average coffee ( by definition, if you just follow the herd, your results will  be average ).

note: it's innovative, but in my opinion, scott is looking for truth the opposite direction ... i will prove this revolutionary approach with mathematical and experimental results and I i will post it on my blog this winter.