brew water temperature and it’s effect on espresso taste and extraction.
brew
temp is an easily accessible brew parameter with the right espresso machine,
but is not something that all café operations chose to alter as part of their
morning dial in. conversely there are plenty of cafes using brew temperature
for everything from regulating extraction yield, to overcoming issues with
machine and grinder temperature as their workload increases. to bridge the gap
and provide some info for new and experienced baristas alike, i have prepared
some objective testing and solid numbers to digest.
brew temperature:
things people say
it
has been observed using a standardised recipe and solid brewing technique that
brewing hotter will result in higher extraction yields (more content removed
over time) while brewing colder will extract content at a slower rate (less
content removed over time).
taste
wise, hotter temps result in increased body and sweetness (with a greater
chance of astringency and bitterness), while cooler temps emphasise less
bitterness, body and sweetness (resulting in a sour, bright shot).
baristas who are savvy with brew temp modification
might make some of the following suggestions :
i. lowering the brew temp will enhance acidity in
coffee/raising the brew temp will decrease acidity in coffee.
ii. as the grinder heats up, the ground espresso
coffee tend to become more soluble, and extraction yields can increase.
lowering the brew temp is a way to counter this.
iii. don’t change your grind to affect your extraction
yield; change your brew temp
iv. increasing the temperature can be used to increase
the extraction yield of a slow, dripping shot.
v. higher temps can be used to compensate for an
underdeveloped roast while lower temps can be used to overcome the high
solubility of an overdeveloped roast.
these suggestions guide practice in many commercial
cafes. there is probably a mixture of truth and half-truth among them, and
maybe even some outright heresy, but it would certainly be nice to have more data
to back it up. if you stay tuned for a follow up article you’ll get exactly
that — i’ll be using some nifty equipment to test the effects of puck depth,
density, and brew temp. for today this article i wanted to answer a simpler
question : what does brew temperature do to extraction yield and flavour ?
the effect of brew
temperature on extraction yield
if you need a quick catch-up on extraction yield and
what it is, check out my previous article on vst baskets here.
to fully test the effects of brew temp on extraction
yield, i set up the following test :
i. 40 × 22g espresso shots were ground en masse and
allowed to cool to room temp.
ii. the espresso shots were prepared using a
standardised recipe: 22g dose, 46-48g beverage, ~29 seconds shot time. the
preparation method used was a stockfleth distribution followed by a single
collapse on the bench and a super firm tamp.
iii. a single grouphead and handle were used.
iv. ten shots were poured at each brew temperature
(92, 94, 96 ve 98°c) espresso was prepared in groups of 10, first at 92, then
94, 96 and 98.
v. shot time and beverage weight were recorded for
each extraction.
vi. a sample of each coffee was immediately removed
and sealed (in a pipette) to prevent sample evaporation.
vii. each sample was filtered
and tds readings were taken.
viii. extraction yield was calculated and recorded.
ix. samples were set aside for tasting.
the raw data
to remove the outliers, ı
sorted each temperature category by extraction yield and removed the two
highest and lowest data points. this reduced the sample size, but removed
outliers resulting from inconsistent extraction behaviour.
tables 1-4 summarise the data for each extraction
temperature, and figure 1 puts it all together for you.
table 1 : brewing at 92°c
cup
|
dose
|
beverage
|
time
|
tds
|
yield %
|
1
|
22g
|
48.3g
|
29sec
|
8.41
|
18.4
|
2
|
22g
|
46.6g
|
28sec
|
8.7
|
18.4
|
3
|
22g
|
48.2g
|
29sec
|
8.53
|
18.8
|
4
|
22g
|
46.2g
|
30sec
|
9.26
|
19.3
|
5
|
22g
|
47.1g
|
30sec
|
9
|
19.3
|
6
|
22g
|
47.1g
|
32sec
|
9.11
|
19.5
|
averages
|
47.3g
|
29.7sec
|
8.8
|
18.95
|
table 2 : brewing at 94°c
cup
|
dose
|
beverage
|
time
|
tds
|
yield %
|
1
|
22 g
|
46.7 g
|
29 sec
|
9.09
|
19.3
|
2
|
22 g
|
46.2 g
|
30 sec
|
9.22
|
19.3
|
3
|
22 g
|
47.1 g
|
32 sec
|
9.01
|
19.3
|
4
|
22 g
|
46.0 g
|
31 sec
|
9.28
|
19.4
|
5
|
22 g
|
45.4 g
|
30 sec
|
9.39
|
19.4
|
6
|
22 g
|
47.8 g
|
30 sec
|
9.03
|
19.5
|
averages
|
46.5 g
|
30.2 sec
|
9.20
|
19.38
|
table 3 : brewing at 96°c
cup
|
dose
|
beverage
|
time
|
tds
|
yield %
|
1
|
22 g
|
44.8 g
|
29 sec
|
9.43
|
19.1
|
2
|
22 g
|
45 g
|
29 sec
|
9.43
|
19.2
|
3
|
22 g
|
46.1g
|
30 sec
|
9.24
|
19.3
|
4
|
22 g
|
45 g
|
29 sec
|
9.49
|
19.4
|
5
|
22 g
|
46.2 g
|
30 sec
|
9.41
|
19.7
|
6
|
22 g
|
47.2 g
|
30 sec
|
9.23
|
19.7
|
averages
|
45.7 g
|
29.5 sec
|
9.4
|
19.40
|
table 4 : brewing at 98°c
cup
|
dose
|
beverage
|
time
|
tds
|
yield %
|
1
|
22g
|
46
|
28 sec
|
9.25
|
19.2
|
2
|
22g
|
47.2 g
|
29 sec
|
9
|
19.3
|
3
|
22g
|
47 g
|
30 sec
|
9.08
|
19.4
|
4
|
22g
|
48 g
|
31 sec
|
8.89
|
19.4
|
5
|
22g
|
48.9 g
|
31 sec
|
9.03
|
20.0
|
6
|
22g
|
48.6 g
|
30 sec
|
9.06
|
20.1
|
averages
|
47.6 g
|
29.8 sec
|
9.1
|
19.57
|
you can see from these results, a nice consistent trend! lower brew
temperatures produced a lower extraction yield, whereas higher brew
temperatures produced a higher extraction yield. with a much larger sample
size, we might expect to see a smoother line. what’s most surprising from this
data is the relatively small difference in extraction yield a 6°c temperature
change makes! the total difference was just over half a percent yield from 92
to 98. even more interesting is just how radically different the cups tasted,
despite the relatively small difference in extraction yield.
the effect of brew
temperature on taste
despite the small differences in extraction yield, the
four temperature groups tasted radically different. ı blind tested this with
our staff and the response was exactly what theory predicts:
i. the lowest temp cups had lower body, sweetness and
bitterness but higher acidity.
ii. the highest temp cups had lots of body, sweetness,
bitterness, medium acid? and a strange powdery mouthfeel .
iii. the two mid temps were balanced, with high levels
of sweetness, balanced acid, low bitterness and good body.
does this mean our tasters were detecting the tiniest
differences in extraction yield, or is it something to do with the balance of
constituents removed from the coffee ? maybe both ? i’m going to go with maybe
both, and if you read on you’ll see why.
the perceived flavour changes which result from
altered brew temperature are in agreement with data from ? the coffee brewing
handbook? (ted lingle, scaa). rather than reprinting the whole section on
temperature changes from the handbook (ı?d love to), figure 2 is a quick graph
ı made from data in the book showing how the flavour components of the brew
change as the extraction temperature changes (74, 94 and 100 °c).
there are a few trends you can see in this graph :
i. the amount of citric acid extracted falls as the
temperature increases from 94 to 100°c.
ii. the amount of malic acid in the cup is lowest at
94°c.
iii. extraction is optimised at 94°c (sucrose/sugar
extraction is at its peak), with a large increase up from 74°c.
even with this snippet of data, you can see the huge
effect brew temperature has on constituent balance*. if this isn’t a great
explanation for the taste differences in our cups, then the other route to
explore the huge effect on taste which we get from very small differences in
extraction yield.
conclusions
if you put it together, this data clearly demonstrates
two things : higher brewing temps lead to higher extraction yields, increased
sweetness, bitterness and body while slightly reducing acidity. lower temps
result in lower extraction yields; have less body, sweetness and bitterness and
more pronounced acidity. although the yield differences are small, the cupping
results are huge, leading me to the conclusion that there’s a little more at
play in terms of what temperature does to our cup profile than to simply
increase or reduce overall extraction yield : the changes to the extraction of
each flavour component are larger than the overall change in extraction.
this round of testing wasn’t thorough enough to answer
some of the most burning questions on the topic of brew temp. one thing that
stands out is the limited information gained from the use of a single espresso
recipe and its resulting flow rate : would a faster flow rate provide a wider
range of extraction yields ? this is something i’m very keen to explore. stay
tuned for an upcoming article in which we further explore the effects of
temperature across a range of grind profiles, as well as the effect your
espresso flow rate has on your ability to thoroughly extract coffee (and how
temp can help in that regard).
*the testing from lingle’s book was conducted with
large volumes of filter coffee, not espresso. still, i believe the effects
observed in my testing on espresso are due to a similar effect of creating a
different balance of constituents depending on the brewing temperature.
by andrew easthope
references
ted lingle. the coffee brewing handbook ( specialty
coffee association of america handbook series, second edition ). scaa, 1996.
Yorumlar
Yorum Gönder